I have been using springboot remote command runner from
ozkanpakdil/CommandRunner around
2 years. And last week I had a chance to play with quarkus. And I
really like the startup time and speed of development is two times
faster.
So I decided to write same command runner with quarkus and see how it works.
ozkanpakdil/quarkus-command-runner
Only
difference is in spring I used hazelcast and in quarkus I used ehcache.
Because hazelcast configuration was not easy as in spring-boot.
Then I decided to install haproxy and run these 2 microservices behind it. You can see the configuration here
I
must say the "command" running at linux side sometimes takes longer
then 60 seconds so I gave haproxy longer timeout instructions. here is
the haproxy admin
According
to numbers spring having downtimes. actually those are times when
springboot responds slower then expected. and quarkus has longer
uptime.
Conclusion: Quarkus is nice and reliable fast solution for microservices. I cant say faster then spring. after all this was just a small use case.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
sony xperia 10 VI did not like the case
After iphone 16 I wanted to test an android and looks like sony xperia 10 VI is nice, which is 6.1 inches, but it was narrow and longer than...
-
Yeni nesil hacker'lar: Edwin Pena | Olympos Security koptum okuyunca yazılımcılar ve pazarlamacılar bu kadar kısa ve özlü bir hikayeyle ...
-
if you have wl11 ejb server and in that environment generated ejb client and deploy to wl12 it will give you this exception java.lang.NoSu...
-
yada ben okuduğumdan onu anladım fekat her zamanki gibi aleti kurarken patladı :) MS in express veya beta şeyleri genelde install aşamasında...
No comments:
Post a Comment